Bargaining Partners: UNIFOR Collective Agreements: June 30, 2022 Dispute Settlement Mechanism: “These signed agreements are an important step in this round of negotiations. Through respectful and good faith negotiations with public service thinkers, we have entered into agreements that provide workers with fair wage adjustments and other provisions that reflect the current work environment. Bargaining Partners: Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council (Esquimalt) (West) (FGDTLC (W)) Collective Agreement Expiry Date: 30. January 2023 Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Conciliation OTTAWA, August 1, 2019 /CNW/ – The Government of Canada continues to negotiate in good faith with negotiators and today signs collective agreements with the Canadian Financial Officers Association and the Professional Association of Research Service Officers. Changes to existing agreements or new provisions include: with other interim agreements, the government has concluded 34 agreements that, if ratified and signed, apply to more than 65,000 federal public service employees. The remaining interim agreements are expected to enter into force in the coming weeks and months, once negotiators have completed their ratification process and both sides sign the agreements. These agreements, which affect more than 6,200 workers from the FS and FI groups, are the first to be signed and ratified in this round of negotiations. This document is regularly updated to reflect current work and new or revised interpretations. Note that this element was designed to identify the conditions under which the work is performed, contrary to the effort required to manage the conditions. This document on implementing guidelines was designed to help evaluators understand FS classification standards, in order to assess the work of the FS accurately and consistently. This document is a reference tool and should be used in combination with the FS classification standard.

If there is a discrepancy between the standard and the guidelines, the standard is a priority. The specific guidelines provide information on the structure and mechanics of the element and explain how the assessment scale can be used by pre-stating the different grades and how to distinguish between degrees. . . . The FS classification standard uses a point assessment method. In this method, each element of the standard receives a relative weighting, that is, a range of points that can be awarded under that element. Each item is divided into levels or degrees to which each is assigned a specific point value. When an order is assessed, a diploma corresponding to the value of the work is awarded in each item. The value of a command given by this method is measured by consonating the points corresponding to the degrees or layers assigned in each element.

This element measures the degree of inconvenience to the mental and physical working conditions in which the work is carried out. The physical environment involves exposure to aspects of work that lead to physical disorders. The degree of inconvenience of these elements is divided into three broad categories: Canada`s interests are reflected in all SF flows and encompass economic, political, commercial or immigration interests.